Deny any part of the dogmatic Magisterium, and you are not a part of God's family - you are a heretic.
Oh the irony when Richard says "heretics either misinterpret a dogma or believe that a dogma is not a dogma"! Is it a dogma or isn't it that there is one Baptism that cleanses every single person who is to be regenerated in Christ, and that this one Baptism is the SACRAMENT in WATER? Is it or is it not a dogma that anyone who says Baptism is not necessary is anathema? Do you accept the declaration of Vienne as it has once been declared, as well as those, which came afterward at Florence and Trent?
Or do you make an exception where they left no room for any? Do you reform the dogmatic definition to be no longer dogmatic? Or do you make untenable excuses to deny the dogma?
Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council, 1870: "[W]e teach and define as a divinely revealed dogma that when the Roman Pontiff speaks EX CATHEDRA, that is, when, in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church, he possesses, by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter, that infallibility which the divine Redeemer willed his Church to enjoy in defining doctrine concerning faith or morals. Therefore, such definitions of the Roman Pontiff are of themselves, and not by the consent of the Church, irreformable."
Richard even admits that dogmatic definitions can have no exceptions - and yet he ignores the fact that he is a heretic and contradicting himself for his denial of the dogmatic definitions on Baptism from the Councils of Vienne, Florence and Trent, as well as the definition that ex cathedra decrees are of themselves irreformable.
Here is a quote from him regarding the "invincible ignorance" controversy and Pope Pius IX:
Richard Ibranyi, "The Salvation Dogma": "Not only have past popes never taught any exceptions, but the clear wording of their infallible decrees condemn anyone who would teach there are exceptions."
So he should know better than to say that the absolute necessity of water baptism is not a dogma. His position is untenable and is damning souls.
Next, his schism:
Out of his own heretical mouth
Richard Ibranyi says that it is not enough for a person to believe everything he believes (which as we have seen above is not the Catholic Faith anyway, but a heretical sect), but that you have to be in contact and communion with HIM specifically and his group, or you are not Catholic. In other words, he refuses communion with you even if you believe all that he believes (which ironically includes his heresy) but you just don't feel the need to have anything to do with him or his group.
Here it is, stated in many different ways, and from his own mouth:
Here Richard states that the ONLY place where the Catholic Church exists now is his own little flock in New Mexico:
He explicitly calls people to get up and move to his location:
St. Matthew 24:24-26: "For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Behold I have told it to you, beforehand. If therefore they shall say to you: Behold he is in the desert, go ye not out: Behold he is in the closets, believe it not"
Psalms 95:5: "For all the gods of the Gentiles (or heretics and schismatics) are devils: but the Lord made the heavens."