Thursday, September 14, 2017

Crisis in the Catholic Church: The Leo XIII Connection

Please read also:
Biblical origin of the Papacy
The Bible teaches what the Catholic Church teaches

We are all called by Jesus Christ, the true God, one in substance with the Father and the Holy Ghost, to believe in Him and in the Church He sent after Himself, and which is protected by the same Holy Ghost.  Further, we are called to live in accordance with the morality of Jesus Christ, as taught by His Church, but admonished to not unite with false worship and false worshippers.

Corinthians 6:15: "And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever?"

But many who believe themselves to be traditional Catholic are in fact following the Vatican II sect directly, or indirectly through attendance at schismatic sects like the SSPV who continue to allow communion with the modern antipopes.  Additionally many of their ideas regarding the indefectibility of the Church, which surely formed some part of their decision making process in this matter, rely on teachings from Leo XIII.  The problem with this is Leo XIII publicly taught a clear deviation from the universal truth that only those who have entered the Church by baptism are counted among the sons and daughters of God.

Masoniclibrary.org: "A Mason believes in the Fatherhood of God requiring that His will be done and that He guides his life. A Mason believes in the great worth of the individual. Great worth not relating to wealth, position or power, but recognising that each individual is a human being, a creation of God, and a person of value. A Mason believes that each individual is under the Fatherhood of God."

Antipope Leo XIII on Freemasonry, Humanum Genus, 1884, #34: "[...] Let, therefore, this holy sodality be strengthened by a daily increase. Amongst the many benefits to be expected from it will be the great benefit of drawing the minds of men to liberty, fraternity, and equality of right; not such as the Freemasons absurdly imagine, but such as Jesus Christ obtained for the human race and St. Francis aspired to: the liberty, We mean, of sons of God, through which we may be free from slavery to Satan or to our passions, both of them most wicked masters; the fraternity whose origin is in God, the common Creator and Father of all; the equality which, founded on justice and charity, does not take away all distinctions among men, but, out of the varieties of life, of duties, and of pursuits, forms that union and that harmony which naturally tend to the benefit and dignity of society."

It seems here very evident then, that the fulfillment of the Alta Vendita was indeed accomplished and, upon further inquiry, that Leo XIII was never pope.

What better place for a Mason to hide, than on the battlefield, in the clothing of the enemy?  How better to allay suspicion than to seem implacable against that enemy, while in fact subtly inculcating the enemy's doctrine?  It was Leo XIII who was silent for  when high ranking members of the American clergy were participators in the first World Parliament of Religions, on Sept. 11, 1893, and even waited two years and one week before finally issuing, not a condemnation or excommunication, but a weak appeal to moderation, stating that, essentially, it would be better for Catholics to not participate, though making no mention of the ispo facto sentences of excommunicate that take place by Divine law for the mere fact of participating in heretical worship.

Antipope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum, #3, The Church Always Visible: "But since the Church is such by divine will and constitution, such it must uniformly remain to the end of time. If it did nor, then it would not have been founded as perpetual, and the end set before it would have been limited to some certain place and to some certain period of time; both of which are contrary to the truth. The union consequently of visible and invisible elements because it harmonizes with the natural order and by God's will belongs to the very essence of the Church, must necessarily remain so long as the Church itself shall endure. Wherefore Chrysostom writes: "Secede not from the Church: for nothing is stronger than the Church. Thy hope is the Church; thy salvation is the Church; thy refuge is the Church. It is higher than the heavens and wider than the earth. It never grows old, but is ever full of vigour. Wherefore Holy Writ pointing to its strength and stability calls it a mountain" (Hom. De capto Eutropio, n. 6)."

The indefectibility of the Church, is most certainly not what Leo XIII would have us believe, in his obvious attempt to groom present and future generations to accept not only the subtle machinations of insidious heretical drops of poison, such as this "God the Father of all" heresy, but to remain tethered to a vessel bound for the seas of indifferentism and moral corruption, unto inevitable ruin when this heresy reaches the culmination of its expression at Assisi in the idolatrous 1986 prayer meeting with the world religions.

For those who have eyes to see, let them see.

God created seven sacraments, but those only two sacraments required for Catholics to exist in every age are the same two sacraments that do not absolutely require ordained priests as their ministers.  Baptism and matrimony, the two sacraments founded by God, the first which can be administered by anyone who can speak and pour water, and the second which is administered by the spouses themselves with a priest only as witness.  Even without priests, we are still able to approach God as his children through baptism and raise children for him through Matrimony.  This is consonant with the notion that even the the end of time, Christ will be with us, as Christ is only truly with those who are baptized, and in a state of grace, though he draws the sinful and faithless by grace.

In this way, the infallibility of the pope and the indefectibility of the Church are not at all the same thing, as some sects would have it, and it is in fact to the detriment of your soul that you continue to receive sacraments from heretic or schismatic priests who have this heresiarch, and/or any of his successors as one of the historical popes.  That is what I believe, for all the stated reasons above and in the links provided above and below: